🔗 Share this article

Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the age of 88, sold 11m books of her various epic books over her half-century literary career. Beloved by all discerning readers over a certain age (45), she was brought to a modern audience last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

Cooper's Fictional Universe

Cooper purists would have wanted to see the Rutshire chronicles in chronological order: beginning with Riders, initially released in 1985, in which the infamous Rupert Campbell-Black, rogue, philanderer, rider, is initially presented. But that’s a side note – what was striking about watching Rivals as a binge-watch was how brilliantly Cooper’s fictional realm had aged. The chronicles encapsulated the 1980s: the power dressing and voluminous skirts; the fixation on status; the upper class sneering at the flashy new money, both overlooking everyone else while they complained about how room-temperature their sparkling wine was; the sexual politics, with unwanted advances and misconduct so everyday they were practically figures in their own right, a double act you could count on to drive the narrative forward.

While Cooper might have occupied this age totally, she was never the proverbial fish not seeing the ocean because it’s everywhere. She had a compassion and an keen insight that you maybe wouldn’t guess from her public persona. Everyone, from the pet to the pony to her parents to her foreign exchange sibling, was always “utterly charming” – unless, that is, they were “absolutely divine”. People got assaulted and worse in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s astonishing how tolerated it is in many more highbrow books of the period.

Social Strata and Personality

She was affluent middle-class, which for all intents and purposes meant that her parent had to earn an income, but she’d have described the social classes more by their customs. The middle-class people fretted about everything, all the time – what society might think, primarily – and the elite didn’t care a … well “such things”. She was risqué, at times incredibly so, but her dialogue was always refined.

She’d recount her upbringing in fairytale terms: “Daddy went to the war and Mother was terribly, terribly worried”. They were both completely gorgeous, participating in a enduring romance, and this Cooper emulated in her own partnership, to a businessman of war books, Leo Cooper. She was in her mid-twenties, he was in his late twenties, the union wasn’t perfect (he was a unfaithful type), but she was never less than confident giving people the secret for a blissful partnership, which is creaking bed springs but (big reveal), they’re squeaking with all the joy. He didn't read her books – he read Prudence once, when he had a cold, and said it made him feel unwell. She didn’t mind, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be spotted reading war chronicles.

Forever keep a diary – it’s very hard, when you’re 25, to recollect what twenty-four felt like

Initial Novels

Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth volume in the Romance collection, which began with Emily in the mid-70s. If you came to Cooper backwards, having commenced in the main series, the early novels, alternatively called “the novels named after posh girls” – also Imogen and Harriet – were close but no cigar, every protagonist feeling like a trial version for Campbell-Black, every female lead a little bit weak. Plus, chapter for chapter (I haven’t actually run the numbers), there wasn't the same quantity of sex in them. They were a bit reserved on topics of decorum, women always being anxious that men would think they’re immoral, men saying outrageous statements about why they favored virgins (similarly, ostensibly, as a real man always wants to be the initial to unseal a container of instant coffee). I don’t know if I’d advise reading these stories at a formative age. I thought for a while that that’s what affluent individuals actually believed.

They were, however, incredibly precisely constructed, effective romances, which is much harder than it seems. You lived Harriet’s surprise baby, Bella’s pissy in-laws, Emily’s loneliness in Scotland – Cooper could transport you from an desperate moment to a windfall of the soul, and you could not ever, even in the early days, identify how she achieved it. Suddenly you’d be chuckling at her highly specific accounts of the sheets, the next you’d have tears in your eyes and uncertainty how they appeared.

Literary Guidance

Inquired how to be a author, Cooper used to say the sort of advice that the famous author would have said, if he could have been bothered to help out a aspiring writer: utilize all all of your senses, say how things aromatic and looked and heard and touched and flavored – it significantly enhances the prose. But perhaps more practical was: “Forever keep a diary – it’s very difficult, when you’re 25, to remember what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the primary realizations you detect, in the more detailed, character-rich books, which have seventeen main characters rather than just a single protagonist, all with extremely posh names, unless they’re Stateside, in which case they’re called a simple moniker. Even an generational gap of four years, between two sisters, between a male and a female, you can perceive in the speech.

An Author's Tale

The origin story of Riders was so perfectly Jilly Cooper it couldn't possibly have been accurate, except it certainly was true because London’s Evening Standard published a notice about it at the era: she finished the whole manuscript in 1970, long before the early novels, brought it into the West End and misplaced it on a public transport. Some detail has been intentionally omitted of this tale – what, for instance, was so significant in the urban area that you would leave the unique draft of your manuscript on a public transport, which is not that different from abandoning your infant on a transport? Undoubtedly an meeting, but what kind?

Cooper was wont to amp up her own messiness and clumsiness